The State Of New Jersey County GIS
Geographic information systems or GIS have become invaluable tools for governments. GIS visualizes specific data sets, enabling governments to interpret volumes of information. This helps them make informed, data-driven decisions on how to deploy resources based upon traceable analytics. GIS is also an integral tool for evolving government transparency. Many New Jersey counties have built and deployed GIS over the years and we have taken a look at their efforts to ascertain the current state of New Jersey GIS.
A big part of GIS’s adoption (and success) among stakeholders is accessibility and usability. There has been a trend in software development that has emphasized the role of user experience and access across mobile, table and desktop devices. By focusing on these two areas, software developers aim to be more inclusive in their designs as to encourage greater engagement with their platforms. GIS is no different.
Inconsistent Cross Browser Experience
We evaluated the eleven available countywide GIS platforms in New Jersey as part of a broader forthcoming study. Our findings indicate that accessibility is inconsistent across browsers and devices and there is room to improve user experience.
A web browser is the gateway to access GIS systems. Individual and organizational browser preference varies. GIS rendered on different browsers produce different user experiences. PropertyPilot tested the compatibility of the 11 available County GIS platforms across popular desktop and mobile browsers. We chose four of the leading web browsers; Google Chrome, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox and Apple Safari. In addition, we tested the mobile browser for the iPhone, Safari IOS.
Of the 11 platforms tested, only two counties’ GIS worked on all of the browsers, (Chrome, Internet Explorer, Firefox and Safari) in addition to mobile. Six counties’ GIS worked on all four of the desktop browsers (Chrome, Internet Explorer, Firefox and Safari), but not on mobile. Two counties GIS worked on only Internet Explorer and Safari and one county’s GIS exclusively worked on Internet Explorer.
option binary demo app While the development and deployment dates of these systems vary, our research indicates that cross-browser functionality, responsive web design and multi-screen display was, as a whole, either not paramount or not relevant when these systems were created. Many of these counties have yet to upgrade their systems, which would have a direct impact on adoption and usage.
fair value option The second part of our accessibility analysis focused on the ease that a given person would have in finding his or her county’s GIS. Many times, an individual would use his or her favorite search engines to track down the appropriate link. What we found is that a user could locate a GIS in as little as one click of the mouse after a Google search or as many as seven clicks to gain access, with the average number of clicks at 3.25.
diversification strategy harvard business review In order to drive meaningful engagement from constituents and government employees, it is important to minimize, when possible, the time and effort required to access critical information. The 3.25 click average we found is acceptable, however, one or two click access is preferable.
County GIS Can Be More User Friendly
platform forex terbaik di malaysia The other piece of our analysis focused on usability. One of the most important aspects of any well-respected online GIS platform is its ease of usability. Users, whether they are local citizens wanting to look up property lot boundaries or expert State geologists investigating known floodplains for a proposed project, want a smooth and painless experience that leads them to their desired information right away.
binär optionen demo The ability to pan and zoom into and out of a GIS platform is crucial since often times specific data/information can only be observed or accessed once a user has drilled down or moved to a specific location on the map. Moreover, speed plays a factor when zooming and panning because lagging GIS can be frustrating and prohibitive to effective use.
binario derivati In evaluating each of the 11 available GIS platforms, the research team was tasked with rating each of the systems either as ‘Excellent,’, ‘Very Good,’, ‘Good’ or ‘Poor,’, according to their panning, zooming and overall navigation ease and efficiency of use. Three researchers independently conducted their own reviews and their selections were later averaged out in what was one of the only subjective tests during the course of the research project.
forex handel oder binÃ¤re optionen Results for the GIS usability (panning/zooming/navigation) after scores were averaged were as follows: one county (9% of available platforms) received an ‘Excellent’ rating, four counties (36% of available platforms) received ‘Very Good’ ratings, three counties (27% of available counties) received ‘Good’ ratings and three counties (27% of available counties) received ‘Poor’ rankings. With only one county receiving the ‘Excellent’ usability honor, certainly the reviewers felt that there is much room for improvement for the remaining platforms on the navigation front. Of the 11 available platforms tested, only 4 provided property assessment data (the valuation placed on property by a public tax assessor for purposes of taxation), while 7 did not.
Building In-House Produces Mixed Results
managed account binäreoptionen Most of these systems were either built in-house or through the New Jersey State GIS Department. While building a system in-house has its benefits; chiefly, the county has full control of specifications and software, it comes at a cost. With advancements in mapping and cloud technology, 3rd-party GIS providers have emerged. These lower cost options provide economies of scale and collective knowledge achieved through experience working with an assortment of governments and government agencies. GIS can now be delivered through a software-as-a-service (SaaS) framework; obsolescence will not occur and technology will remain cutting edge.
http://mployee.nl/websiteProject?id=a1Oa0000000DWOtEAO binaire opties zijn risicovol